Authors: David Tyrell, Kristine Severson, Brian Marquis, Eloy Martinez, Ron Mayville, Robert Rancatore, Richard Stringfellow, Randolph Hammond, A. Benjamin Perlman
Date of Publication: April 1999
Sponsoring Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation - Federal Railroad Administration
Performing Organization: USDOT Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Tufts University - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Arthur D. Little Inc.
Report No:
Abstract:
A study has been conducted of locomotive crashworthiness in a range of collision scenarios to support the efforts of the Locomotive Crashworthiness Working Group of the Federal Railroad Administration's Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC) to develop locomotive crashworthiness requirements. The RSAC is a government/industry committee including all segments of the rail community, with the purpose of developing solutions to safety regulatory issues. This paper presents the results of a study of the crashworthiness of conventional and modified locomotive designs in five collision scenarios. The five collision scenarios studied are:
Results of the study show that shelf couplers are not effective in preventing
one locomotive from climbing another; the Canadian National (CN) anti-climber
design is not more effective than the conventional anti-climbed design
in preventing one locomotive from climbing another; increased window structure
strength is effective in increasing locomotive crashworthiness in a collision
with logs; increased short hood strength is effective in increasing locomotive
crashworthiness in a collision with an intermodal trailer; and modifications
to the locomotive front plate and plow designs will not influence the consequences
of an oblique collision with a side-sill design covered hopper car.
No. of Pages: 10
To Order This Document: Request Document No. RA450002